Writing 2: Scientific Literature Review

From UCSB English Department Knowledge Base

Welcome to the English Department Knowledge Base at the University of California, Santa Barbara.
The EDKB Wiki is a database that makes available the various interests, talents, and resources of the English Department community. See the Main Page to learn more about the EDKB. The wiki does not offer information on current course offerings, nor is it a comprehensive archive of materials related to all past courses. Visit the English Department home page for this type of information.

Instructor: Melissa Stevenson, Winter 2001

Length: 3-5 pages typed double spaced in 12 point Times or similar font. This length does not include the reference page.

Topic: An issue of ongoing debate in the sciences. To be approved by me.

Resources: At least 3 magazine, newspaper or journal articles. One popular and two professional. You are encouraged to use more resources in your work. You may include properly cited reference from the internet, books, television, etc. Include all articles in your portfolio.

Title: A clear and succinct description of your project and argument.

Abstract: A brief summary of your entire paper. Should give the reader a quick and clear idea of your work and results (see Roslin Institute’s abstract in the reader). This should be written last.

Introduction: Introduction to the issue at hand. What is the question? Why is it important and to whom is it significant? What is its history? Previous study? Present your precise focus or thesis.

Summary of Literature: A properly cited, impartial presentation of the information in your resources as it relates to your particular issue and question. Not simply a summary, but a chance to highlight relevant and conflicting information. Use APA format. Present information in this section, NOT critique or personal opinion (that comes later).

Discussion: Time for critique. What does it all mean? Weigh and analyze your resources. Take note of the completeness or inaccuracies of the articles. Analyze methods, etc. Bring up points of conflict, inaccuracy, etc. Ask questions of the resources.

Conclusion: Summarize the existing knowledge confirmed. Point out topics and issues for future study and debate. Present your own findings. Your chance to present your reasoned and well-supported opinion. Point out your own areas of potential prejudice and error.

References: Cite your resources using APA documentation (see Hacker 365).

Extra Credit: You may earn extra credit by including 2 more professional articles in your work.

Portfolio: Your portfolio should include all the work you have done in the course up to this point. You must also include all outlines or rough drafts for the science literature review, and copies of all your sources.

--MarthineSatris 17:24, 8 August 2007 (PDT)